Name the material
Record the species or material type, finish, component, intended product, and the exact claim under review.
Leather sourcing intelligence
Build an evidence-ready sourcing brief, map the records behind each claim, and open the source that defines the standard.
Record → scope → date → owner
The work before the claim
It should start with the material, the chain, the question, and the evidence needed to answer it. Tannyl structures that first pass without pretending to replace an auditor, laboratory, certification program, or lawyer.
Record the species or material type, finish, component, intended product, and the exact claim under review.
Separate farm or origin, slaughterhouse, trader, tannery, subcontractor, manufacturer, and brand records.
Ask what an audit, certificate, test, transaction record, or policy actually covers—and what it does not.
Turn the evidence into a dated, qualified sentence instead of a broad “sustainable” conclusion.
A useful output
Choose the product, sourcing objective, and evidence lanes. Tannyl returns a structured request that your team can print, download, and take into a supplier conversation.
Open the brief builderSource desk
Start with Leather Working Group standards, Textile Exchange leather resources, published brand standards, official regulatory updates, and the FTC’s environmental-claims guidance.
Open the reviewed sources →Deliberately not a certification
No live supplier profiles. No pay-to-verify badge. No marketplace transactions. No broad green claim. No inference that a facility audit establishes product-level chain of custody.