Leather sourcing intelligence

From hide
to proof.

Build an evidence-ready sourcing brief, map the records behind each claim, and open the source that defines the standard.

RAW MATERIAL
TANNERY
FINISHED LOT
EVIDENCE TICKET · 04Claim ≠ certificate

Record → scope → date → owner

01 / 04BRIEF → EVIDENCE → SOURCE

The work before the claim

A sourcing brief should not start with a badge.

It should start with the material, the chain, the question, and the evidence needed to answer it. Tannyl structures that first pass without pretending to replace an auditor, laboratory, certification program, or lawyer.

01

Name the material

Record the species or material type, finish, component, intended product, and the exact claim under review.

02

Map the chain

Separate farm or origin, slaughterhouse, trader, tannery, subcontractor, manufacturer, and brand records.

03

Read the scope

Ask what an audit, certificate, test, transaction record, or policy actually covers—and what it does not.

04

Write narrowly

Turn the evidence into a dated, qualified sentence instead of a broad “sustainable” conclusion.

A useful output

One brief.
Every missing proof.

Choose the product, sourcing objective, and evidence lanes. Tannyl returns a structured request that your team can print, download, and take into a supplier conversation.

Open the brief builder
TANNYL / SOURCING BRIEFLOCAL ONLY
  1. Material identityType, species, component, finish, intended use
  2. Chain-of-custody boundaryWhich tiers, lots, transfers, and dates are documented?
  3. Audit scopeFacility, process, product, transaction, or organization?
  4. Claim sentenceSpecific benefit, limitation, source, review date

Source desk

Read the governing document—not the marketing shorthand.

Start with Leather Working Group standards, Textile Exchange leather resources, published brand standards, official regulatory updates, and the FTC’s environmental-claims guidance.

Open the reviewed sources

Deliberately not a certification

Tannyl organizes evidence.
It does not award conclusions.

No live supplier profiles. No pay-to-verify badge. No marketplace transactions. No broad green claim. No inference that a facility audit establishes product-level chain of custody.